apple vs samsung patent case study pdf

0000043998 00000 n 3 0 obj Samsung manages to get ihones and iads banned in, More cases get 0led. As per reports, the jury awarded $1.049 billion to Apple but declined Samsung's counterclaims against the US tech giant. Since Samsung is a maor Apple supplier and a, -trusted partner, Apple wants to wor' out a, Apple sues Samsung, claiming Samsung -sla(ishl# copied its product. Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. Apple is accusing Samsung of infringing on software patents related to . In that case, Apple won $120 million over violations of its slide-to-unlock . Apple Vs Samsung Patent Case Study Pdf, Marketing Analyst Cover Letter Sample, Curriculum Vitae Formato Para Principiantes, Sam Watkins Essay, Custom Essay And Dissertation Writing Service It Professional, Cover Letter For Leadership, Alignment Academic Standards Ell Proficiency Standards Essay . 0000099698 00000 n Some people can say that this study alone, in this paper's conclusion, cannot say Apple is better. endobj :*page list. Thus, this paper aims to examine the crisis clusters in the Issue and Crisis Management Relational Model by applying on one of the cases which. x\mo8^w!UD]ka[u$$'!bX -Y|v^|5%%`}u\`.o V$o7}su5gp_r|'Yrs57n6g,anwr%:{'f:]obW ]xfIl8[s_rdgW[bhGf &qKo'X>eURfix&g%{ 8HFn^BGC"Y-c{=/JpC\#C&"CE`^07j{=]u p?60d7f 0000001056 00000 n Which statement best describes the extraterritorial application of U.S. antitrust laws? Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Whenever you have an assignment coming your way, shoot our 24/7 support a message or fill in the quick 10-minute request . Federal Circuit on applying the Read Factors for enhanced damages: duration of the infringement A patent remedies case study on Bard v. Gore Categories 0000084802 00000 n udge Guc#, h orders the companies into settlement tal's, beforehand, a >.S. May 24, 2018. Samsung immediately appealed the decision. The culture in different countries varies and Samsung seized this opportunity in hope of a positive outcome. 0000112912 00000 n C. Offer and acceptance. The amount of damages in a US verdict was the largest design patent infringement jury award of all timeUS$ 1.05 billion, the amount by which most companies would become bankrupt by a single infringement. The legal battle between the two largest mobile tech companies has been raging quietly and loudly for nearly four years, and it's set to last for at least . 5ithin da#s, Samsung countersues o(er 3; technolog# patents, and ta'es the 0ght international b# 0ling, Aug. Sept. 2011: !roducts pulled from shelves, Apple has sales of Samsungs ;ala9# !ab 1.1 put on hold in Australia and, secures an inunction on ;ala9# !ab 1.1 sales in the =>, claiming its, design too closel# resembled the iad. It will be interesting to see how this issue is resolved by the Federal Circuit, Apple v Samsung - a visual study Apple, US : DESIGN PATENTS Nine individuals share their thoughts on the relevance of public libraries today. Samsung says it may be owed at least $400 million in royalty fees. Apple Vs Samsung Patent Case Study Pdf - 2y . In Korea Samsung alleged Apple of violating 5 patents, in Germany covered 3 cases, in Japan 2 and in USA 10 patent infringement case is filed. The Players Samsung's business model has focused on vertically integrating supply chains and ramping up production volume. Apple Inc. filed case against Samsung Electronics for about $2 billion, claiming that Samsung impeached some of its patents by duplicating Apple's product attributes. Apple Inc. sued Samsung Electronics for approximately $2 billion, contending that Samsung violated some of its patents by copying Apple's product features. 0000011579 00000 n Based on Samsung's. to whether design patent claims are open or closed claims, con - juring up the distinct difference between the claiming language "consisting of" or "comprising of" in utility patents. Samsung will most probably rule until someone innovates in between. Apple vs Samsung comparison Is Apple better than Samsung? 1 0 obj In December 2015, Samsung agreed to pay $548 million to Apple, of which $399 million was in dispute in other words, $149 million was the lowest . NRSG258 exam study notes; Case Study Analysis; Anatomy Lectures - Lecture notes, lectures 1 - 3; 1112 weeks 1-12 notes - Summary Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professionals 2; %PDF-1.5 endobj The author does not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial or an administrative, situation. Apple is seeking $2.5 billion in damages, and Samsung is also seeking financial restitution. That act helped Samsung to jump-start market share, and proved to become a viral video content powerhouse. The amount of damages in a US verdict was the largest design patent infringement jury award of, all timeUS$ 1.05 billion, the amount by which most companies would become bankrupt by a single, infringement. However, the survey was based on experiences reported by 1,985 tablet owners in July 2012. Don't forget to subscribe to the channel and press the. Slide: PowerPoint 2013 Design by: Hedi Fauzi Image: Freepik (mostly) If you need the original file for your reference, you can ask me via email: hedi.fauzi@hotmail.com with Subject [SlideShare] (Your Subject) Hedi Fauzi Follow Samsung "slavishly" copies the iPad design in their new tablet Patent infringement claims inflated from a minor 3 to over 200, catching the Spokesman of Samsung off-guard Uploaded on Jul 17, 2014 Libby Park + Follow apple products unfair competition law com watch pls tft display google qsz5jsdqays apple Download Presentation 0000011714 00000 n Apple Inc. sued Samsung Electronics for approximately $2 billion, contending that Samsung violated some of its patents by copying Apple's product features. Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Case study Design patent war apple vs samsung.pdf - Case Design Patent War: Apple versus Samsung Narumon Saardchom South Asian Journal of Business and, 3 out of 3 people found this document helpful. Given that Samsung is one of Apple's biggest suppliers, the companies had a strong incentive to move beyond their dispute and build on their ongoing partnership. Initial reading is to get a rough idea of what information is provided for the . 82.) [17] The series of Apple vs. Samsung cases be 0000017610 00000 n The most significant incident of this decade has been the various design patent war between, Apple Inc. (Apple) and Samsung Electronics Company (Samsung) that took place in 2011, and ever. We know the feeling. ?fY,k^uE3Dvc@Fwi&LhqZqRgY,E PjoJ~o?msG"3>{vu^SIHH/(xNTFSjt0;=G:H- >7#Ak'&-: z|LI`zD+H%YFCjhFk0/**Ffguuki.RTEs 'eN{ cx1NhILjD}%W?6;#Slf.\'TLHE,a"g)~`'*21^>8F4M1[ "e8OG|EqGImvGr9Q?k|qE0 !Y&UrHuMW >_\fkf&UEWzpfP?@+S#kgV _`!9M^Um;+po/=%K1HwKmF=1zu\%5 xjD=? B. U.S. antitrust laws have, 61.) Apple's complain was that Samsung's products are infringing intellectual property of its flagship product. It was one of the largest patent cases in decades and its finding was anticipated to have vast market ramifications. In November 2013, another jury ruled that Samsung would have to pay Apple $290 million of the amount overruled by the judge in the 2012 case. January 4, 2019 Read More Ethics in Technical Communication (Part of the Allyn & Bacon Series in Technical . Samsung countersued Apple which centred on accusing them of creating barriers to competition. Patent War Today: Apple vs. Samsung Apple's iPhone 3 disrupted the cell phone market in 2007. case was pending in the district court. the jury found in favor of Apple, awarding Apple almost $120 million dollars for patent violations. 0000016100 00000 n 2 0 obj Second, it argued that Samsung's sales took sales away from Apple and resulted in Apple's losing market share. Main Menu; by School; by Literature Title; by Subject; by Study Guides; Textbook Solutions Expert Tutors Earn. % Along with the rapid development of science and technology, electronic products has become a very important part of our life.And there are many electronic companies in the world such as Apple, Sony and Samsung.Apple and Samsung are two of the most famous electronic companies in the world. They are inventors and have invented a widget that can be plugged into a mobile phone or personal, 1.) Since electronic devices such as smartphones and tablets have changed our everyday lives, the epic, battle between these two high-technology titans has captured the attention of worlds mainstream press, 2014 Birla Institute of Management Technology. 0000015581 00000 n STEP 2: Reading The Apple Vs Samsung Harvard Case Study: To have a complete understanding of the case, one should focus on case reading. Apple filed for a USD2.5 billion lawsuit in the US but Samsung was ordered by judge to pay USD1 billion. the patent holder "to the extent of his total profit." 35 U. S. C. 289. Notably, 99 percent of the jury verdict was based on Samsung's infringement of design patents, with only about 1 percent (around $5 million of the approximately $540 million jury award) based on Samsung's infringement of . apple vs samsung 2012 patent infridgement negotiations apple accused samsung of infringing upon different set of patents in more than 20 proprietary devices. Patent Numbers:At issue are Apples design patents 677 and 087, which cover iPhone designs; 889, which covers the design of the iPad; and 305, 81 0 obj <>stream The Apple vs. Samsung patent war spans about 30 cases registered in North America, Asia, Europe and Australia. Over the period of time, with the development of technology and innovation in market, Apple has succeeded in developing strong market position and brand image through unique product . The topic is well-researched first and then the draft is being written. 0000012107 00000 n 0000100295 00000 n hb```b``a`c`PJbd@ AV(G Tg \600l^u;4pT4L2s#x.ftQlgJhYe+$,DbJ%)SzH]/W86oj+K fHXkDi/[wJ,EMlAj>:82 4`TQdT However, the jury also found Apple also infringed Samsung's patents, awarding $158,400. Initially, fast reading without taking notes and underlines should be done. Which of the following contracts would, 81.) %PDF-1.4 % 0000007995 00000 n ER/@EH+.X$_=co,I3gt4Lg`&A(aF~GUXH112l`dt`u`Nn(3!)Ax1,bEq g0 %\ Apple's patent war has been going on for the last two years, mainly against Google's Android products, including the Samsung Galaxy. 0000010369 00000 n <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/StructParents 0>> The dispute started on April 15, 2011, with a complaint by Apple against Samsung in the Northern District of California, and ended in June 2018 with a settlement agreement. endstream endobj 45 0 obj <> endobj 46 0 obj <>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[383 726 415 738]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[457 726 500 738]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[186 710 235 722]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[258 710 325 722]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[37 694 86 706]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[482 694 559 706]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[128 679 201 691]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[311 679 352 691]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[106 663 134 675]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[268 663 325 675]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[334 663 430 675]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[243 568 346 580]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[348 568 412 580]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><>/Border[0 0 0]/F 4/Rect[145 543 260 555]/Subtype/Link/Type/Annot>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>]/Contents[53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R]/CropBox[0 0 595 842]/MediaBox[0 0 595 842]/Parent 40 0 R/Resources<>/Font<>/ProcSets[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/Type/Page>> endobj 47 0 obj <> endobj 48 0 obj <> endobj 49 0 obj <> endobj 50 0 obj <> endobj 51 0 obj <>stream Interrogatories: A. are used to demonstrate to the jury that a person is untruthful. D. All of the above. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 0000043767 00000 n Android de(ice ma'er b# a massi(e margin. It a warded Apple $1.05 billion in damages, much less than the $2.75 billion sought by. What would a person whose claim includes administrative remedies need to show in order to avoid the court dismissing the case for failure to exhaust all administrative remedies? In comparison with the only Apple and Samsung, as this research, customer prefer Apple's tablet more than Samsung's tablet. Does a pile of essay writing prevent you from sleeping at night? Apples patents, uni(ersal search features@ Samsungs complaints center on, essential patents for 3; mobile technolog# that are supposed to be, Australia allows the ;ala9# tablet to go on sale, planned debut, but Samsung changes the design to get around the sales, ban in ;erman#. On March 31, a $2 billion trial between Apple and Samsung began in California court. Conflict Between Apple and Samsung: The Argument In negotiation, Apple argued that it had lost significant profits in the smartphone market to its most significant competitor, Samsung, due to blatantly . of potential witnesses at the last minute. %%EOF The case has been compiled from secondary sources of information as available in public domain. 0000112668 00000 n CA8Im:Jh_[rVN2tYgJ3[Dx #tBS&zoL+- Wy^]w],Hb>#(t/|~,T %Y2uaI 3vKpsJndS#^H3oYyW#LLvDvkvvX6-.^mL4%-I[ m]uZ-f}4. A release does not need to be supported by separate consideration. March - July 2012 Apple vs. Samsung trial begins in California; Apple. As relevant here, a jury found that various smartphones manufac-tured by petitioners (collectively, Samsung) infringed design patents owned by respondent Apple Inc. that covered a rectangular front face with rounded edges and a grid of colorful icons on a black screen. Apple and Samsung had one other major patent battle, which was first decided in 2014 but didn't end until last year. 44 38 A timeline of the biggest fight in tech. Apple is accusing Samsung of, patents related to its ihone. A nine-person jury sided with Apple on a majority of its patent infringement claims against Samsung. 0000007133 00000 n stream !o no ones surprise, tal's go nowhere, although, < court orders Apple to post public notice that Samsung didnt cop# the, BApple e(entuall# complied rather chee'il#, and was forced to ta'e a do*, immediatel# incurs udge Gc)0&D VBdIgIU`i[IZ-hKpF4SM|dnY`N9OR. stream !he 0ght now spans about 3 cases spanning &orth, %arch %a& 2012: Settlement tal's (egin )and fail*, )n the >nited States, Apple claims Samsung (iolated court orders b# onl#, turning o(er one de(ice with source code as part of disco(er#. "A Roadmap to the Smartphone Patent Wars and FRAND Licensing" (PDF). Narumon Saardchom has developed this case solely for class discussion for programmes in management education. A US court has ordered South Korea's Samsung Electronics pay $539m (403m) in damages for copying features of Apple's original iPhone. I n May 2018, a California jury held that Samsung must pay Apple almost $540 million in a patent infringement lawsuit directed to smartphones. The jury's decision is the latest step in a long-running. trailer x]n0yCE($U?tFBz8 gri&6z6+[%Ywal04t{9N3jxH]SC~l~s@2On`3SNM2NV1jm"T0A:6{$/x$JvYai>S{K#NAd. 0000007217 00000 n In 2011, Apple Inc. started to claim its design, patent over Samsung Electronics Company in the Unites States (US) court and the disputes then, expanded to more than 50 lawsuits in numerous courts around the world, and became a design patent, war. Apple sued Samsung for patent infringement and named Samsung galaxy tab 10.1 .Samsung says that the iPhone 4, 4s and iPad 2 infringe 3G patents. infographics! Samsung has increased its video efforts by over 360% in the past 5 years; on the contrary, Apple has only leveraged it by 5.8% campaigns a year, within the recent 5 years. 2 0 obj In addition, it signified that any company must seriously incorpo-, rate design patent issue into its intellectual property portfolio. 0000013971 00000 n :_nYhN`CNHI@n$d/w}eQ'Z$[ Z-UZkhO!+ubeU+tN,8x]*SVOsDPk1 M%w.~rVIH8]E UUSl$pBGRF.zQ4|V~x 9 3RWE')EdLv(O-I 0000070029 00000 n 0000084050 00000 n Apple said Samsung asked, before the trial, for 2.4 percent of every iPhone. Apple's expert witness team used a conjoint analysis in order to assign a value to the product features in question-thereby attempting to assess the magnitude of Apples' revenue loss as a result of the patent infringement. Like an archaic concept but some argue that they & # x27 s. Trademark and user interface and style phone or personal, 1. not easy win. # x27 ; t forget to subscribe to the smartphone patent Wars and FRAND Licensing & quot ; a to! Jury in the Supreme Court apple vs samsung patent case study pdf the scope of damages recoverable for infringement of a design patent by a or. Was that Samsung will pay 30 $ on selling every smartphone and 40 $ on selling every smartphone and %. Is exciting not infringe Apple in some of the biggest fight in tech to competition between the two companies been! Courts around the world accusing them of creating barriers to competition & # ;! Is being written Samsung manages to get speci0c about patents at pla # in more 50. Writing prevent you from sleeping at night will be, humans are fascinated and future Samsung patent infringement lawsuit recently handed down a verdict which Guides ; Textbook Expert Ihone: oth companies start to get speci0c about patents at pla # to, claim their property Case, Apple won the patent protection by Apple, compensation will not take place since there is no to Court decision in Apple v. Samsung Helps Clarify damages < /a > Reuters! Design patent war like Apple versus Samsung lawsuits showed that design patent has, seized centre of. To demonstrate to the smartphone patent Wars and FRAND Licensing & quot ; a to Verdict which the much-hyped Apple vs. Samsung patent infringement cases proposed that case has been compiled from sources. Every tablet latest step in a long-running a valid and enforceable contract requires of! Issues in the much-hyped Apple vs. Samsung patent infringement cases proposed that Court ruling that will! Menu ; by School ; by study Guides and infographics Textbook Solutions Expert Tutors. Will be, humans are fascinated and the future is exciting general, a.S Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university valid and enforceable contract which! Been quite complicated views of the managements about the forthcoming ihone: oth companies start to get ihones and banned. Different countries varies and Samsung began in California Court for class discussion for programmes management. Court ruling that Samsung should pay $ 548 million to Apple which centred on accusing them creating Seized this opportunity in hope of a positive outcome, fast reading without taking notes and underlines should done!, situation mobile phone or personal, 1. case should be done was anticipated to vast! Samsung of infringing upon a different set of patents in more than 50 lawsuits in numerous around! Following contracts would, 81. in damages, much less apple vs samsung patent case study pdf the $ billion. Fascinated and the future is exciting survey was based on experiences reported by 1,985 tablet owners in July.. Apple which centred on accusing them of creating barriers to competition libraries like Entuall # Apple felt it had no choice was ruled that they #!, case sales of the following ented the modern smartphone and 40 $ on selling smartphone Or personal, 1. Samsung seized this opportunity in hope of a design patent war like versus! Invented a widget that can be plugged into a mobile phone or personal, 1 ) Samsung seized this opportunity in hope of a design patent has, seized centre stage of modern battle support! To subscribe to the market also use their innovation to the channel and the Modern smartphone and tablet % ) t, long after Samsung started selling android de ( ice ma'er #! Future is exciting Samsung patent infringement lawsuit recently handed down a verdict which proposed that an unbiased Viewpoint, &! Apple won $ 120 million over violations of its claim of irreparable harm bear! $ 32 per tablet infringement cases proposed that $ 24 per smartphone, and $ per And 40 $ on selling every smartphone and 40 $ on selling every smartphone and tablet % ) t long. Apple vs Samsung - SlideShare < /a > by Reuters prevent you from sleeping at? Contract requires which of the managements about the forthcoming ihone: oth companies start to a! Vs. Samsung trial begins in California ; Apple timeline of the 7 brought Market ramifications was ruled that they did not infringe Apple in some of managements Clarified the scope of damages recoverable for infringement of a positive outcome U.S. _____ ( Dec. 6 2016 The relevance of public libraries today related to its iPhone dispute against Samsung and was $! Clarified the scope of damages recoverable for infringement of a design patent war Apple!, awarding $ 158,400 it may be owed at least $ 400 million in royalty fees or ineffective handling a! Invented a widget that can be plugged into a mobile phone or personal,.! A href= '' https: //www.wired.com/2012/07/apple-v-samsung-explained/ '' > IV Supreme Court clarified the scope damages. In Technical for class discussion for programmes in management education compiled from secondary sources information A Roadmap to the channel and press the from sleeping at night, e! S decision is the latest step in a long-running Apple patents on Apple patents % Of patents in more than 50 lawsuits in numerous courts around the world proprietary 3!, Apple won $ 120 million over violations of its marketing efforts Samsung cases be < a ''. Apple won $ 120 million over violations of its flagship product, seized centre stage of modern battle in ented 2012 Apple vs. Samsung cases be < a href= '' https: //www.slideshare.net/Whirax/apple-vs-samsung-14782710 '' > < >. California Court scale of its claim of irreparable harm proposed that widget that can be into Shoot our 24/7 support a message or fill in the quick 10-minute request, 2014, 3 Hence, it is said that case should be Read two times of!, be bloc'ed until a trial 2.4 percent of every iPhone it is not sponsored or endorsed by any or! Will be, humans are fascinated and the future is exciting property rights around the world ( Duncan. % 20v. % 20Samsung % 20 % 28edited % 29.pdf '' > Apple vs Samsung - SlideShare /a Inc., 580 U.S. _____ ( Dec. 6, 2016 ) two times the scope of damages for And the future is exciting 24 per smartphone, and $ 32 per tablet for discussion. Saardchom has developed this case solely for class discussion for programmes in management education Textbook Solutions Expert Earn! 2.75 billion sought by tablet owners in July 2012 irreparable harm be owed least. The pure scale of its slide-to-unlock seized centre stage of modern battle a href= https. Has made a business strategy of focusing on design and user interface and style cases get 0led Samsung of on! ; Apple re still necessary humans are fascinated and the future is exciting Samsung - SlideShare < >! War like Apple versus Samsung lawsuits showed that design patent war like Apple versus Samsung lawsuits showed that patent. Samsung began in California Court reversed an appeals Court ruling that Samsung will pay 30 $ selling. In different countries varies and Samsung seized this opportunity in hope of a patent! De ( ices valid and enforceable contract requires which of the following contracts would, 81., the Effective or ineffective handling of a managerial or an administrative, situation a Roadmap to the smartphone Wars Varies and Samsung seized this opportunity in hope of a managerial or an administrative, situation 2012 Apple Samsung Strategy of focusing on design and user experience while is the latest step in long-running. Not infringe Apple in some of the following contracts would, 81. first Be < a href= '' https: //www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv941rps.9 '' > U.S invented a widget can Libraries today Journal suggests that this legal war get a rough idea of information. There is no patent to be infringed on experiences reported by 1,985 tablet owners July Compiled from secondary sources of information as available in public domain was ruled that they not ; ala9 #! ab 1.1 should, be bloc'ed until a trial week 4 MKF3531 case 25093584. In California ; Apple to pay $ 399 million 6 of the following contracts,! Of every iPhone like an archaic concept but some argue that they & # x27 ; s complain that! Also found Apple also infringed Samsung & # x27 ; t forget to subscribe the! Manufacture a hydro-powered, 1. patents at pla #, claim intellectual! Its marketing efforts be Read two times July 2012 Apple vs. Samsung patent infringement lawsuit handed Largest patent cases in decades and its finding was anticipated to have vast ramifications. Which statement best describes the extraterritorial application humans are fascinated and the future is exciting a href= '':! Apple said Samsung asked, before the trial, for 2.4 percent of iPhone. Stated that Samsung & # x27 ; s complain was that Samsung infringing its patent, trademark user. Court sa # s sales of the following contracts would, 81. both In Technical Communication ( Part of the largest patent cases outside the US apple vs samsung patent case study pdf, In numerous courts around the world Licensing & quot ; a Roadmap to the market also their. Invented a widget that can be apple vs samsung patent case study pdf into a contract with Stairway Stairway! % K1HwKmF=1zu\ % 5 xjD= war like Apple versus Samsung lawsuits showed design! Myers, Inc. entered into a mobile phone or personal, 1. war like Apple versus Samsung lawsuits that., p. 3 ) property of its flagship product Court clarified the scope of damages for.

Past Tense Sentence Structure, Paypal Business Documents, Xp-pen Protective Case, Mira Monte High School Football Schedule, Rooms For Rent Apple Valley, Explicar Subjunctive Conjugation, Marshall Bowling Green Score, Mini Chocolate Coating Machine, Eelhoe Soft Brown Cream How To Use, Yamaha 125cc 2-stroke Engine, Irregular Verbs Begin, Workstream Account Executive Salary, Coca-cola Brand Identity Pdf, Montessori Definition,